🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly allowing the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has inadvertently benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the far right shifted from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and immigration, established political groups increasingly adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these ideas and indicated to voters that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Political communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was evident even when mainstream parties were criticising the far right. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations throughout Europe.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found throughout the continent, as elected officials from countries including the UK to France adopt the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Some political parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the radical right, even as studies suggests that doing so drives the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered revealed that the impact of radical parties had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "But if you hear this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The research emphasized the necessity for established parties to carve out their own narratives, especially on topics such as migration and assimilation, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which tune should be heard."